Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Patrick Callum

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. j⚛e decker ^talk 06:18, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Patrick Callum

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of WP:NOTABILITY. WP:SPA creator whose username indicates a WP:COI. Boleyn (talk) 21:33, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:36, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:36, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:37, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A local activist that lacks substantial coverage by reliable sources. The citation given is mainly about Callum's organization. An independent search for sources gets a hit from The Gleaner that quotes Callum but provides no biograpical depth. Not enough to pass GNG. • Gene93k (talk) 18:56, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Closest thing to a claim of notability is that he's CEO of a non-notable chapter of a non-notable organization in Jamaica. Even if the Jamaican organization were notable, the local chapter would not be, and the head of the local chapter is not, either. WP:NOTINHERITED². TJRC (talk) 19:53, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. BLP — actually, in all likelihood an WP:AUTOBIO if you check the creator's username — about a person who has not held any role that would qualify him for inclusion under WP:NPOL, and without enough reliable sourcing to get him past WP:GNG either. Bearcat (talk) 03:57, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.